+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: NTFS vs FAT

  1. #1
    ivica178 is offline x10Hosting Member ivica178 is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    9

    NTFS vs FAT

    Why is NTFS faster than FAT, or isn't?

  2. #2
    neverlate2day's Avatar
    neverlate2day is offline x10 Sophmore neverlate2day is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    170

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    did u try googling before posting

  3. #3
    monaco is offline x10Hosting Member monaco is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    10

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    To know these please go to http://www.wikipedia.org/, type NTFS then FAT. You will know more...

  4. #4
    alexandgruntz is offline x10 Elder alexandgruntz is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    744

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    NTFS is more efficient than FAT(32), as NTFS's cluster sizes are smaller, resulting in less wasted space. It also supports compression and encryption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS.
    Left.

  5. #5
    Smith6612's Avatar
    Smith6612 is offline <<< wants a Turkey Smith6612 has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Exploded
    Posts
    6,483

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    FAT is suppored by basically any operating system and is the least trouble free when it comes down to Linux and such. However NTFS is very flexible and a well done File System. Yeah it may be a pain in the butt to get working in Linux in some cases, but it's certainly much more efficient. Think of NTFS as Windows NT Kernel and FAT32 as DOS (which is actually what each File System is built for I believe). DOS is a bit more unstable than the NT Kernel.

    My signature likes cookies! Do you? :D

  6. #6
    Livewire's Avatar
    Livewire is offline Abuse Compliance Officer Livewire is a glorious beacon of lightLivewire is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Behind a keyboard.
    Posts
    8,995

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    I'm surprised no one's mentioned that FAT cannot handle a single file larger than 4gb.

    Granted theres very few LEGAL reasons to want a filesize larger than that, but there are some (DVD backups, game disc backups, etc).

    So if you're trying to make a backup of your Crysis DVD, or of your favorite movie, you're dead in the water on FAT (assuming you're backing it up into an iso or other non-compressed format), whereas NTFS will simply say yes if theres enough space left.


    TOS breakers will be suspended regardless of race, creed, national origin, hair color, or favorite food. Thanks for your understanding!

  7. #7
    vol7ron's Avatar
    vol7ron is offline x10 Lieutenant vol7ron is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    434

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    FAT16 = Ancient
    FAT32 = Legacy
    NTFS = New compression/encryption and smaller clusters


    NTFS is not backwards migratable, but FAT32 is forward migratable. I think I got that right. That is, if you installed your OS to FAT32, you can make it NTFS without losing any data. However, once you're NTFS, you cannot go back to FAT32, without reformatting and reinstalling your OS.

    I heard from a Microsoft rep that NTFS is soon to be replaced as well.
    If you find my post useful please add to my reputation by clicking the +Rep button
    You may also use the Donate link to donate credits - this is appreciated too Thanks to those whom have donated so far!


  8. #8
    nirajkum is offline x10 Sophmore nirajkum is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    161

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    FAT is like windows 98 very basic but very user frndly. NTFS is more sofisticated . The data is stored in NTFS is well organised as compared to FAT so it is fast .FAT cant handle file with more than 4GB.

    To support NTFS on Linux yoc ana refer http://www.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php

  9. #9
    Sharky's Avatar
    Sharky is offline Admiral Awesome Sharky will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Outside the USA
    Posts
    3,306

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    Quote Originally Posted by vol7ron View Post
    NTFS is not backwards migratable, but FAT32 is forward migratable. I think I got that right. That is, if you installed your OS to FAT32, you can make it NTFS without losing any data. However, once you're NTFS, you cannot go back to FAT32, without reformatting and reinstalling your OS.
    Not quite true... PartitionMagic should be able to do this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PartitionMagic
    The physics is theoretical but the fun is real.

  10. #10
    Nathan H is offline x10 Elder Nathan H is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    562

    Re: NTFS vs FAT

    This is true, Partition magic does allow the transition between ANY file systems with no loss of data.
    Nathan H Formerly UnFoundBug



    http://www.theadmin.co.uk - Yes i know the colours don't go, I'm working on it.

    VPS Admin | x10-commandments

    So thats where it went! I thought i was losing my mind.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ubuntu 8.04 and KDE4!
    By Sup3rkirby in forum Computers & Technology
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-12-2008, 10:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
x10hosting free hosting for the masses
dedicated servers