+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

  1. #1
    browndrake is offline x10Hosting Member browndrake is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    13

    AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    I am putting together a server for my house. I am going to be running ubuntu server on it and using it to host some apps which are run off a webserver.. mostly with php/mysql.

    I have two old machines: AMD athlon 1.4ghz and celeron 2.6ghz. Both have 512mb ram.

    How much difference will there be in their performance for the above task. The celeron has a much faster processor but the amd has twice as much cache. I have never really dealt with this type of thing before, but thought that several of you would have a fair bit of experience.

    Any feedback on pros/cons of either/both. Is there even any comparison or is one much better than the other.

    Thanks for your feedback

    browndrake

  2. #2
    Livewire's Avatar
    Livewire is offline Abuse Compliance Officer Livewire is a glorious beacon of lightLivewire is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Behind a keyboard.
    Posts
    8,995

    Re: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    For a webserver the main slow-down should actually be the speed of the hard-drive; in my opinion I'd use the AMD 1.4ghz for it - leave the 2.6 available for something that needs the extra oomph behind it.


    TOS breakers will be suspended regardless of race, creed, national origin, hair color, or favorite food. Thanks for your understanding!

  3. #3
    JKoltner is offline x10Hosting Member JKoltner is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wimer, Oregon
    Posts
    23

    Re: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    I agree with LiveWire... unless you start installing "CPU intensive" server applications like MySQL or PHP or somesuch on your PC, the hard drive will most likely be the limiting factor and either CPU will be unlikely to hit even 10% CPU utilization.

    In terms of raw performance (e.g., an infinitely fast hard drive), I doubt you'd see that Celeron garnering more than 10-20% extra speed anyway -- I'd use the AMD.

  4. #4
    browndrake is offline x10Hosting Member browndrake is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    13

    Re: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    Thanks for the feedback..

    How "CPU intensive" are MySQL or PHP? The main purpose of the server is to host an application that is mostly MySQL and PHP.
    The app is mostly calendaring, data entry, storage and recall. The most intensive part would be when scanning in documents and saving them as pdf. (this action will be done but infrequently)

    Thanks again

    browndrake

  5. #5
    asoit is offline x10Hosting Member asoit is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    35

    Re: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    Most likely AMD has more cache witch is good for server-based purposes, so I would suggest it

  6. #6
    gptsven is offline x10 Lieutenant gptsven is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    253

    Re: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    id go for a SATA Disk 10 000 rpm

  7. #7
    Smith6612's Avatar
    Smith6612 is offline <<< wants a Turkey Smith6612 has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Exploded
    Posts
    6,483

    Re: AMD athlon 1.4ghz vs celeron 2.6ghz

    Quote Originally Posted by browndrake View Post
    Thanks for the feedback..

    How "CPU intensive" are MySQL or PHP? The main purpose of the server is to host an application that is mostly MySQL and PHP.
    The app is mostly calendaring, data entry, storage and recall. The most intensive part would be when scanning in documents and saving them as pdf. (this action will be done but infrequently)

    Thanks again

    browndrake
    MySQL, PHP and HTTP/DNS working together isn't very CPU intensive depending on what you're doing. Before I moved to x10Hosting, my Linux router was also a web server. It has a Pentium III 600Mhz processor on it and it was able to generate pages quite quickly.

    My signature likes cookies! Do you? :D

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
x10hosting free hosting for the masses
dedicated servers