Suspension due to Hacking

**msigma20** · 06-30-2011 01:57 PM

I have been suspended due to illegal hacking. I just want to state that i feel this is unjust. I am not giving information on illegal hacking. I am infact giving information as to legal hacking such as consoles. As far as I am aware this is not against x10Hosting's terms and conditions. If it is in fact not against the terms and conditions may I please be unsuspended. If it still against the terms and conditions may I be unsuspended temporarily so that I may change my website to come into line with x10Hosting's terms and conditions? I

**stpvoice** · 06-30-2011 02:05 PM

Hello,

From the Terms of Service:

Originally Posted by Terms of Service

* Warez: Includes pirated software, ROMS, emulators, phreaking, hacking, password cracking, IP spoofing, etc... This also includes any sites which provide "links to" or "how to" information about such material.

It's a zero tolerance (permanent) suspension. You can have no further access to your account. Whether the hacking is illegal or not is beside the point.

**msigma20** · 06-30-2011 02:14 PM

I did not know that the terms also do not allow legal hacking or information pertaining to how to do so. In my defence when i had a problem with automatic suspension due to inactivity (which is now resolved). I sent a support ticket and when i recived help the person helping me did not question my site or give me a warning. In fact he even stated that he thought my front page was quite good. Surely you would agree that this is misleading?

Link to thread: Automatic Suspension problem

**~~Livewire~~** · 06-30-2011 02:41 PM

The front page did not contain the hacking links, and a failure to notice the violation is not a confirmation of a site being within the TOS. We're still human, and mistakes do occasionally get made.

I have verified the suspension reason via SSH, so the suspension will stand. I can understand that you probably feel that this isn't a valid suspension because a different viewer didn't notice the hacking material being present; quite possibly they only offered it a cursory glance and didn't go into an in-depth review anyways.

What this -doesn't- change is that the site -was- violating the terms of service. It's no different than running a stop sign and not being caught by the cops who were right around the corner - you still broke the law, you just didn't get caught that time. The equivalent here is being caught on camera and still receiving the ticket later.