Re: Account Suspended
It would seem to me that any organisation claiming to be dedicated to security would be running from a secured environment if it cared in any way about its credibility. HTTP on a server that does not offer secure access would be an immediate red flag in my book. Active phishing pages (rather than screenshots) would be another -- anybody who is sufficiently interested can create the page; there's no need to have working examples (a discussion of the techniques underlying would be sufficient -- although it would still be against the ToS for this particular host). For a seminar, a local webserver on your presentation laptop would have sufficed, and even been better -- you could have used things like Unicode ambiguity to increase awareness.
Oddly enough, "education" is the number one excuse given for maintaining phishing pages here. And it takes very little effort to create a ghost organisation (look at the trouble that Pierre Plantard's non-existent Prieury de Sion has caused over the years). If you're serious, you need to get a lot more serious about building up your bona fides, no matter which host you eventually intend to use. A public record of having been booted from a variety of web hosts is working in the wrong direction.
“Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.” --Donald Knuth
"It was as if its architects were given a perfectly good hammer and gleefully replied, 'neat! With this hammer, we can build a tool that can pound in nails.'" -- Alex Papadimoulis (on TheDailyWTF.com)