image review: gotta know.

[0010111]

i have to know, is the second image in my signature legible ?

[kirtik]

It's legible, but not prettyful. The red 'strobes', making it difficult to read.

[zen-r]

To a large extent, it depends on the viewer's screen size. But the red text would be a struggle to read on the average laptop screen.

Obviously, you don't really need the web address in your sig when one can just click it to go to your site, but it is always a bonus if the address can be displayed.

I'd suggest a redesign ;)

[0010111]

a few ... though if these aren't liked i would like to request that someone make (must have komui from D.Gray-man in it though(or another person from the science division in it))

[Livewire]

I like the first 3, 4th I'm finding a tad difficult to read but still INFINITELY better than the red on black

All 4'll work wonders though.

[0010111]

anyone willing to help ? i'll give 100 credits to the one i like... 10 to those who tried.

must have komui from D.Gray-man in it though(or another person from the science division in it)

[intertec]

Moved---

[kirtik]

I can knock on up tomorrow, if noone has by.... say, 8pm bst.

[kkenny]

They all look good in my opinion, but then I'm using a funky screen. but nice design :]

[alz4445]

To a large extent, it depends on the viewer's screen size. But the red text would be a struggle to read on the average laptop screen.

Obviously, you don't really need the web address in your sig when one can just click it to go to your site, but it is always a bonus if the address can be displayed.

I'd suggest a redesign ;)

Well, I'm on a laptop with an 'average' screen size and I can read it just fine.


And do you really need your web address that many times?