in chemistry, when we write the electric configuration of an element its like this :
for Na ( Sodium ) :
k l m n
2 8 1
now the quesiton is why do we write k l m n as shells why not a b c d as shells of the atom.
in chemistry, when we write the electric configuration of an element its like this :
for Na ( Sodium ) :
k l m n
2 8 1
now the quesiton is why do we write k l m n as shells why not a b c d as shells of the atom.
Here's the answer to almost exactly the same question, word-for-word:
http://education.jlab.org/qa/historyele_02.html
Last edited by Sheer Cold; 05-23-2008 at 12:20 PM.
i don't understand a thing of what you just said :D
please help me out and register Here
:hsughr:This section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.:hsughr:
"Barkla labeled them with the letters K, L, M, N, O, P, and Q. (The origin of this terminology was alphabetic. K for hypothetical spectral lines that were never discovered.) These letters were later found to correspond to the n-values 1, 2, 3, etc. They are used in the spectroscopic Siegbahn notation."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_shell
The link in a previous post did quite a good job as well..
Last edited by Spartan Erik; 05-23-2008 at 10:43 PM.
i am 15, and its not a lame question, it has some logic, why k l m n as shells of the atoms why not a b c d.
Most of my year 11 chem class asked exactly the same question, and like normal with chem it was just made up by the guy who found it.
Anyway the sub shell configurations are far more interesting, if you want to do some more reading. ;)
~LHVWB, Formerly known as Verbsite.
Getting Started | Forum Rules | X10 Commandments
Terms of Service | Getting Support | IRC Support Chat
Using Simple Machines Forums? Check out my SMF Mods..
but the real question is why did he named k l m n why not a b c d