Re: help....please.....
Good point misson, I'd have to double that. The code looks nothing even near to valid. In fact it even renders wrong, the copyright statement is halfway the content...
The occasional "hack" using "<p> </p>", isn't of any importance to anyone, but this is just BAD.
You don't even need ANY of them, it's 'easy' to create the exact same lay-out (without the bugs) in decent HTML & CSS.
If you look at the errors generated by the w3c validator you'll also notice they're not innocent. (Although any warning/error of the validator should be resolved.)
eg:
line 92 column 9 - Error: ID "mainBody" already defined
line 100 column 25 - Error: document type does not allow element "font" here; assuming missing "li" start-tag
line 107 column 23 - Error: end tag for "li" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
You should really fix that thing, it's not even far from close to the supposed standards.
Last edited by marshian; 02-17-2010 at 07:03 PM.
Reason: typo'd misson xD
Real programmers don't document their code - if it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.